Difference between revisions of "A rigorous approach to lesson learning"
Davide Piga (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Discussion - Header|type=FAQ |
| − | + | ||
| − | |type=FAQ | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Discussion - Side Box |
| + | |topics=Group Methods and Knowledge Sharing | ||
| + | |keywords=lessons learned, innovation management, good practices, pcm, models | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Discussion - Original Message | ||
|posted by=Juliana Caicedo | |posted by=Juliana Caicedo | ||
|posted on=2010/08/06 | |posted on=2010/08/06 | ||
| Line 19: | Line 15: | ||
Juliana | Juliana | ||
| + | |type=FAQ | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Discussion - Contributors |
| − | |contributed by=Juliana Caicedo,Atanu Garai,Nancy White,Arthur Shelley,Juliana Caicedo,Ian Thorpe,Manuel Flury, | + | |contributed by=Juliana Caicedo,Atanu Garai,Nancy White,Arthur Shelley,Juliana Caicedo,Ian Thorpe,Manuel Flury,Christina Merl,Jaap Pels, |
| + | |type=FAQ | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | === Summary === | + | === Summary === |
| − | ==== Detailed Description ==== | + | ==== Detailed Description ==== |
| − | [the meat of the topic – clearly, crisply communicated summary of the topic. Where relevant, a brief story – no more than 1-2 paragraphs - of how this topic has been turned into practice, ideally from the KM4Dev archives? If the example is long, separate into a separate subsection] | + | [the meat of the topic – clearly, crisply communicated summary of the topic. Where relevant, a brief story – no more than 1-2 paragraphs - of how this topic has been turned into practice, ideally from the KM4Dev archives? If the example is long, separate into a separate subsection] |
| − | ==== Examples in Application ==== | + | ==== Examples in Application ==== |
| − | [One or a few practical examples and references that illustrate the topic or show how it is done in practice] | + | [One or a few practical examples and references that illustrate the topic or show how it is done in practice] |
==== Further Information ==== | ==== Further Information ==== | ||
Latest revision as of 06:35, 29 July 2013
|
| |||||||||||
Contents
Original Message
From: Juliana Caicedo, posted on 2010/08/06
Hi everyone,
A newcomer to this group, I’m looking forward to participating in many interesting conversations. I’d like to start by consulting you on an issue I’ve been struggling with: what would be a rigorous (almost scientific?) yet light enough methodology/approach to capturing lessons learned throughout the project cycle. As humans, we all have our own perceptions and biases, so I’m looking for a way to minimize those and extract lessons from an intervention that can become valid/solid evidence to inform a new program /project, perhaps in a different context. I believe that a methodology that is too heavy or cumbersome will just discourage people from properly reflecting and capturing their lessons learned for the good of the organization, but I also think that rigour is important if we are to use those lessons to inform decision making.
Grateful for any insights and experiences that you’d like to share with me.
Juliana
Contributors
All replies in full are available in the discussion page. Contributions received with thanks from:
Juliana Caicedo
Atanu Garai
Nancy White
Arthur Shelley
Juliana Caicedo
Ian Thorpe
Manuel Flury
Christina Merl
Jaap Pels
Related Discussions
Summary
Detailed Description
[the meat of the topic – clearly, crisply communicated summary of the topic. Where relevant, a brief story – no more than 1-2 paragraphs - of how this topic has been turned into practice, ideally from the KM4Dev archives? If the example is long, separate into a separate subsection]
Examples in Application
[One or a few practical examples and references that illustrate the topic or show how it is done in practice]
