Difference between revisions of "Social Network Mapping: how to map partners' capabilities"

From KM4Dev Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "{{E-Discussion - Contributors" to "{{Discussion - Contributors")
m (Text replace - "{{E-Discussion - Original Message" to "{{Discussion - Original Message")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{E-Discussion - Header}}
+
{{Discussion - Header}}
{{E-Discussion - Side Box
+
{{Discussion - Side Box
 
|topics=Communities and Networks
 
|topics=Communities and Networks
 
|keywords=knowledge mapping, partnerships,  
 
|keywords=knowledge mapping, partnerships,  
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|latin america=No
 
|latin america=No
 
}}
 
}}
{{E-Discussion - Original Message
+
{{Discussion - Original Message
 
|posted by=Cristina Sette
 
|posted by=Cristina Sette
 
|posted on=2010/04/20
 
|posted on=2010/04/20

Latest revision as of 15:57, 6 October 2010


Original Message

From: Cristina Sette, posted on 2010/04/20

Have anyone seen/used a methodology/tool for mapping/identifying partners capabilities to carry out a project in partnership? I cannot find much on the topic and am interested in working in that area.

All suggestions are much welcome.

Programme Specialist, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative, Italy.

Contributors

All replies in full are available in the discussion page. Contributions received with thanks from:

Cristina Sette
Eva Schiffer
Shalini Kala

Related Discussions

Summary

Detailed Description

[the meat of the topic – clearly, crisply communicated summary of the topic. Where relevant, a brief story – no more than 1-2 paragraphs - of how this topic has been turned into practice, ideally from the KM4Dev archives? If the example is long, separate into a separate subsection]

Examples in Application

[One or a few practical examples and references that illustrate the topic or show how it is done in practice]

Recommended Resources

[Links to publications, websites, contacts and general resources shared in the e-discussion]