Difference between revisions of "Monitoring, Measuring and Evaluating KM"

From KM4Dev Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "|related e-discussion=" to "|related discussion=")
m (Text replace - "{{E-Discussion - Header" to "{{Discussion - Header")
Line 1: Line 1:
{{E-Discussion - Header}}
+
{{Discussion - Header}}
 
{{E-Discussion - Side Box
 
{{E-Discussion - Side Box
 
|topics=Monitoring and Evaluation
 
|topics=Monitoring and Evaluation

Revision as of 15:56, 6 October 2010


Original Message

From: Sarah Cummings, posted on 2010/02/17

Dear All

I would like to point you in the direction of Ewen Le Borgne's blog post on "Monitoring knowledge management: an impossible task?" which reflects on the thorny question of M&E of KM which represents (and I quote) ....a series of tough choices in a maze of possibilities. It considers a possible spectrum of M&E, divided between linear, pragmatic and emergent approaches, and sketches the differences between them.

The post can be found at: http://thegiraffe.wordpress.com/2009/12/17/monitoring-knowledge-management-an-impossible-task/

Think you will find it interesting.

Best wishes

Sarah Cummings

Contributors

All replies in full are available in the discussion page. Contributions received with thanks from:

Sarah Cummings
Roxanna Samii
Simon Hearn
Alain Berger
Nancy White
Ewen Le Borgne

Related Discussions

Summary

Detailed Description

[the meat of the topic – clearly, crisply communicated summary of the topic. Where relevant, a brief story – no more than 1-2 paragraphs - of how this topic has been turned into practice, ideally from the KM4Dev archives? If the example is long, separate into a separate subsection]

Examples in Application

[One or a few practical examples and references that illustrate the topic or show how it is done in practice]

Recommended Resources

[Links to publications, websites, contacts and general resources shared in the e-discussion]